Home > Cannot Assign > Ifconfig Cannot Assign Address

Ifconfig Cannot Assign Address


Thank you! xparse processor with multiple arguments How to delete the lines from a file that do not contain dot? Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the Vembu BDR suite - Backup Solution - Overview (Part 1) 3 days ago VMware Cloud on Amazon AWS - The Hybrid Cloud 3 weeks ago Setup Amazon AWS - Free Tier his comment is here

Click here for instructions on how to enable JavaScript in your browser. It's pretty annoying because I run a computer at home with one ip address for my internal clients to access my site from and one for my external clients. In other Linux distributions it goes like (i.e.) ifconfig eth0:1 address netmask ifconfig eth0:1 up That doesn't work in SLESS 11. ponce View Public Profile View LQ Blog View Review Entries View HCL Entries View LQ Wiki Contributions Visit ponce's homepage! http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/ip-alias-siocsifflags-cannot-assign-requested-address-912985/

Siocsifflags Cannot Assign Requested Address Ubuntu

so not sure if it only shows a list of "remaining" versions that haven't already been nominated for the bug. Steve Langasek (vorlon) on 2008-11-14 Changed in ifupdown: status: Confirmed → Invalid Steve Langasek (vorlon) wrote on 2008-11-14: #37 Thank you for reporting this bug and helping to improve Ubuntu. Required fields are marked *Comment Name * Email * Website Currently you have JavaScript disabled. I'll play later on a non-server with wireless to make sure that the change is benign there. ├▒ull (erniecom) wrote on 2008-05-06: #15 There must still be something else wrong.

kfsone (oliver-kfs) wrote on 2011-05-24: #52 /etc/lsb-release 8x--- snip ---x8 DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=10.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=lucid DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS" 8x--- snip ---x8 /etc/network/interfaces 8x--- snip ---x8 # This file describes the network interfaces available So I don't have any good suggestions on how to resolve this for Ubuntu 8.04 LTS, but given the significant impact it's reported to have for server users in certain configurations, I took the new mac address which was incremented by 1 from my current one (old 11:11:11:11:11:cf, new 11:11:11:11:11:d0) sudo ifconfig wlan0 down sudo ifconfig wlan0 hw ether 11:11:11:11:11:d0 There was Centos Siocsifflags Cannot Assign Requested Address This should be done on two machines.

There is one cable from MIMO to router and router network interface is configured for outer network. Otherwise, I guess one could make sure to use the parent device as the dhcp interface, and then static virtual interfaces for the rest, not sure if this is by design Tom Metro (tmetro+ubuntu) wrote on 2009-03-31: #42 Tormod Volden wrote: > The seven first comments indicate that this is a harmless warning and that things otherwise > work well. For info, please visit http://www.isc.org/sw/dhcp/ SIOCSIFFLAGS: Cannot assign requested address SIOCSIFFLAGS: Cannot assign requested address Bind socket to interface: No such device Failed to bring up eth1:1. ...done.

What are these? Linux Connect Cannot Assign Requested Address In any event, the patch (above) did the trick. I had a custom script (related to dynamic DNS) in /etc/network/if-up.d/ The script was failing, and as a result, the DCHP aquired address was not getting assigned to the interface. Look at the image below to understand it better.

Ifconfig Siocsifflags Cannot Assign Requested Address

The time now is 07:24 PM. The reason: I want to run a BIND on 2 machines with 2 separate IP addresses and on shared (service) IP address. Siocsifflags Cannot Assign Requested Address Ubuntu gumptravels (pml-dtbb) on 2008-09-20 Changed in wireless-tools: status: New → Confirmed gumptravels (pml-dtbb) wrote on 2008-09-20: #25 Maybe if all the bug reporters try the nomination feature we can get this Siocsifflags Cannot Assign Requested Address Debian Very annoying buglet.

So, if I bring down an interface with ifconfig BIND can still see the interface. this content Why is Professor Lewin correct regarding dimensional analysis, and I'm not? In my config # ip addr add dev eth1 does nothing - ifconfig: [....] eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 5C:F3:FC:E5:F0:22 inet addr: Bcast: Mask: UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 Specifically, DHCP doesn't work on virtual ethernet interfaces (such as eth0:0), and if DHCP is on the parent interface (eth0), that when you stop the DHCP client/tools, it takes down the Siocsifflags: Cannot Assign Requested Address Redhat

ifconfig | grep HWaddr ifconfig eth0 down ifconfig eth0 hw ether 00:1E:68:35:FF:91 ifconfig eth0 up ifconfig eth0 hw ether 00:1d:92:43:f1:29 Best of luck share|improve this answer edited May 30 '14 at Edit bug mail Other bug subscribers Subscribe someone else Related questions gnome-nettool in Ubuntu: eth Patches patch to /etc/network/if-pre-up.d/wireless-tools for error on bringing up alias interfaces. (edit) patch to /etc/network/if-pre-up.d/wireless-tools for CentOS The Community ENTerprise Operating System Skip to content Search Advanced search Quick links Unanswered posts Active topics Search The team FAQ Login Register Board index CentOS 6 CentOS 6 - weblink This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant.

It's easier to merge duplicate reports later, than to try to debug several different issues in the same report. Siocsifnetmask Cannot Assign Requested Address Ubuntu Udo jmroth15-May-2012, 13:27Hello all, I am looking for a method to control virtual IPs (IP aliases) like an real interface with ifconfig/ip or ifup/-down. Tormod Volden (tormodvolden) wrote on 2008-09-22: #31 Tyles, does this problem that you describe have anything to do with the original bug report about the appearance of this warning message?

Do humans have an ethical obligation to prevent animal on animal violence?

Top Display posts from previous: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by AuthorPost timeSubject AscendingDescending Post Reply Print view 3 posts • Page 1 of 1 Return Changelog follows: wireless-tools (29-1.1ubuntu2) jaunty; urgency=low * Revert change to bring up the interface before changing wireless settings; the softmac driver this was implemented for is now obsolete, no other drivers eth0:0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:04:5A:7D:4C:73 inet addr: Bcast: Mask: UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 Interrupt:9 Base address:0xf800 ... $ ping -c 1 PING ( 56(84) bytes of data. Rtnetlink Answers: Cannot Assign Requested Address Affecting: ifupdown (Ubuntu Hardy) Filed here by: Steve Langasek When: 2008-11-14 Completed: 2008-11-14 Package (Find…) Status Importance Invalid Undecided Assigned to Nobody Me Comment on this change (optional) Email me about

This leads me to the conclusion that there's no NAT. I did the same and it worked well for me, but I cannot test it on a wireless system. For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. check over here Washington DC odd tour request issue Lab colleague uses cracked software.

How often should I replace windscreen wiper blades? I am sorry 8-) Here I tried it with eth1 ifconfig: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 5C:F3:FC:E5:F0:20 inet addr: Bcast: Mask: inet6 addr: 2003:4:f023:8000:5ef3:fcff:fee5:f020/64 Scope:Global inet6 addr: fe80::5ef3:fcff:fee5:f020/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING This bug deals with virtual interfaces triggering a "SIOCSIFFLAGS: Cannot assign requested address" warning, while still succeeding, and can be remedied by removing or patching the /etc/network/if-pre-up.d/wireless-tools file. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the